Quran on Son of God

Quran on Son of God

First, let’s see what the Bible says about the phrase “son of God”.

Luke 1:35

και αποκριθεις ο αγγελος ειπεν αυτη πνευμα αγιον επελευσεται επι σε και δυναμις υψιστου επισκιασει σοι διο και το γεννωμενον αγιον κληθησεται υιος θεου

35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

The Bible also says this about Adam, who also had no human father. 

Luke 3:38

του ενως του σηθ του αδαμ του θεου

38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

The Bible says this of God’s appointed kings. 

Psalms 2:6-7

  ואני נסכתי מלכי על־ציון הר־קדשׁי

6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.

אספרה אל חק יהוה אמר אלי בני אתה אני היום ילדתיך

7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

2 Samuel 7:14

אני אהיה־לו לאב והוא יהיה־לי לבן אשׁר בהעותו והכחתיו בשׁבט אנשׁים ובנגעי בני אדם

14 I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men:

The Bible quotes these verses when explaining Jesus’s position as the son of God.

Hebrews 1:5

τινι γαρ ειπεν ποτε των αγγελων υιος μου ει συ εγω σημερον γεγεννηκα σε και παλιν εγω εσομαι αυτω εις πατερα και αυτος εσται μοι εις υιον

5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

And look at Romans 1:4

του ορισθεντος υιου θεου εν δυναμει κατα πνευμα αγιωσυνης εξ αναστασεως νεκρων ιησου χριστου του κυριου ημων

4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

We can see that, when the Bible calls Jesus, God’s son, it is definitely NOT teaching that Jesus is the product of God taking a wife and having a son with her.  The Bible clearly explains that it is NOT teaching this.  There is nothing in the Bible to suggest this. 

The explanation given by the Bible in these passages is clearly metaphorical in nature. 

Most of the pre-Islamic Arabs were pagan.  Pagan gods are depicted as regularly taking wives and procreating with them. 

The Quran fights these pagan ideas, it is not fighting the Bible.  This can be seen by the fact that nearly all of the verses in the Quran that talk about this use the word “walad” or a word derived from “walad”, which indicates a child, infant, kid, product of a marriage.  The more general Arabic word for son, “ibn”, is rarely used in these verses.

The Quran clarifies that it is fighting these pagan ideas in these verses.

Quran 6:100-103

‏وَجَعَلُوا۟ لِلَّهِ شُرَكَآءَ ٱلْجِنَّ وَخَلَقَهُمْ ۖ وَخَرَقُوا۟ لَهُۥ بَنِينَ وَبَنَتٍۭ بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍۢ ۚ سُبْحَنَهُۥ وَتَعَلَىٰ عَمَّا يَصِفُونَ

100. Yet they make the Jinns equals with Allah, though Allah did create the Jinns; and they falsely, having no knowledge, attribute to Him sons and daughters. Praise and glory be to Him! (for He is) above what they attribute to Him!

‏بَدِيعُ ٱلسَّمَوَتِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ ۖ أَنَّىٰ يَكُونُ لَهُۥ وَلَدٌۭ وَلَمْ تَكُن لَّهُۥ صَحِبَةٌۭ ۖ وَخَلَقَ كُلَّ شَىْءٍۢ ۖ وَهُوَ بِكُلِّ شَىْءٍ عَلِيمٌۭ

101. To Him is due the primal origin of the heavens and the earth: How can He have a son when He hath no consort? He created all things, and He hath full knowledge of all things.

‏ذَلِكُمُ ٱللَّهُ رَبُّكُمْ ۖ لَآ إِلَهَ إِلَّا هُوَ ۖ خَلِقُ كُلِّ شَىْءٍۢ فَٱعْبُدُوهُ ۚ وَهُوَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَىْءٍۢ وَكِيلٌۭ

102. That is Allah, your Lord! there is no god but He, the Creator of all things: then worship ye Him: and He hath power to dispose of all affairs.

 ‏لَّا تُدْرِكُهُ ٱلْأَبْصَرُ وَهُوَ يُدْرِكُ ٱلْأَبْصَرَ ۖ وَهُوَ ٱللَّطِيفُ ٱلْخَبِيرُ

103. No vision can grasp Him, but His grasp is over all vision: He is above all comprehension, yet is acquainted with all things

Al-Mawrid: A Modern Arabic-English Dictionary, 7^th edition, defines certain key words this way:

Walada (seen in these quotes in the form Yalid): to beget, sire, procreate, generate

Wulida (seen in these quotes in the form Yulid):  to be born; to come into existence, come into being, see the light, originate

Walad: child, kid; baby, infant; descendant, offspring, scion; son; boy

Ibn: son; child; boy; descendant

Here you can see that the Quran is condemning the idea that God has procreated with a wife to produce a son.  It is not contradicting the true teachings of the Bible.

‏وَأَنَّهُۥ تَعَلَىٰ جَدُّ رَبِّنَا مَا ٱتَّخَذَ صَحِبَةًۭ وَلَا وَلَدًۭا

Quran 72: 3  'And exalted is the Majesty of our Lord: He has taken neither a wife nor a son (Waladan).

 ‏وَقَالُوا۟ ٱتَّخَذَ ٱللَّهُ وَلَدًۭا ۗ سُبْحَنَهُۥ ۖ بَل لَّهُۥ مَا فِى ٱلسَّمَوَتِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ ۖ كُلٌّۭ لَّهُۥ قَنِتُونَ

Quran 2: 116  They say: "God hath begotten a son (Waladan)": Glory be to Him.—Nay, to Him belongs all that is in the heavens and on earth: everything renders worship to Him.'"

‏مَا كَانَ لِلَّهِ أَن يَتَّخِذَ مِن وَلَدٍۢ ۖ سُبْحَنَهُۥٓ ۚ إِذَا قَضَىٰٓ أَمْرًۭا فَإِنَّمَا يَقُولُ لَهُۥ كُن فَيَكُونُ

Quran 19:35  It is not befitting to (the majesty of) God that He should beget a son (Waladin).

 ‏وَقَالُوا۟ ٱتَّخَذَ ٱلرَّحْمَنُ وَلَدًۭا

Quran 19:88 They say: "(God) Most Gracious has begotten a son (Waladan)!"

 ‏لَمْ يَلِدْ وَلَمْ يُولَدْ

Quran 112:3 He begetteth (Yalid) not, nor is He begotten (Yulad);

‏وَقَالَتِ ٱلْيَهُودُ عُزَيْرٌ ٱبْنُ ٱللَّهِ وَقَالَتِ ٱلنَّصَرَى ٱلْمَسِيحُ ٱبْنُ ٱللَّهِ ۖ ذَلِكَ قَوْلُهُم بِأَفْوَهِهِمْ ۖ يُضَهِـُٔونَ قَوْلَ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ مِن قَبْلُ ۚ قَتَلَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ ۚ أَنَّىٰ يُؤْفَكُونَ

Quran 9:30  The Jews call ’Uzair a son of God, and the Christians call Christ the son (Ibn) of God.  That is a saying from their mouth; (In this) they but imitate what the Unbelievers of old used to say. God's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!

These verses were important because they differentiate the true God from the pagan gods the Arabs had been worshipping. 

Early Christians adopted many aspects of Paganism into their beliefs, including God’s relationship to Mary and Jesus. 

You can see one modern example of this in the Catholic Church, the largest denomination.  Catholics pray to Mary as the “Queen of Heaven.  They teach that Mary remained a virgin her whole life because she is the “Spouse of the Holy Spirit” and they constantly refer to her as the “Mother of God”.  Any good Catholic will tell you that they don’t believe God had sex with Mary and produced Jesus.  They will tell you that they are being metaphorical when they call her the “Spouse of the Holy Spirit”.  I don’t want to misrepresent their position.  But, they do take it literally enough that they insist it would have been adultery for Mary to have sex with Joseph.  That is why they believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary.  Most Protestants would consider these positions to be blasphemous, and certainly all Muslims would.

Many people assume that the Quran is portraying the Christian belief of Jesus as the “Son of God” as being similar to the pagan gods and their offspring.  But, I believe the Quran was fighting against several ideas at once.  It obviously spends some time explaining that God is not like the pagan gods who procreated.  But it also explicitly says that Jesus is not God.

Quran 5:72

‏لَقَدْ كَفَرَ ٱلَّذِينَ قَالُوٓا۟ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ هُوَ ٱلْمَسِيحُ ٱبْنُ مَرْيَمَ ۖ وَقَالَ ٱلْمَسِيحُ يَبَنِىٓ إِسْرَٓءِيلَ ٱعْبُدُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ رَبِّى وَرَبَّكُمْ ۖ إِنَّهُۥ مَن يُشْرِكْ بِٱللَّهِ فَقَدْ حَرَّمَ ٱللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ ٱلْجَنَّةَ وَمَأْوَىٰهُ ٱلنَّارُ ۖ وَمَا لِلظَّلِمِينَ مِنْ أَنصَارٍۢ

72. They do blaspheme who say: "(Allah) is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help.

The Quran promotes a strict monotheistic view of the universe where there is only one being who is actually God and He made everyone else, including Jesus. 

The Bible uses the phrase “Son of God” in a metaphorical sense, which is compatible with strict monotheism.  But, the Nicene Creed defines the phrase “Son of God” in a non-metaphorical way.  I believe that an honest look at the language of the Nicene Creed will explain why a strict monotheist would condemn it.  And I believe that its definition of “Son of God” is rather close to the Arabic word “walad” in meaning.  I believe the Quran condemns the Nicene Creed when it repeatedly says that God does not have a “walad”.

Here is the Nicene Creed as defined in the first Ecumenical Council in Nicaea in A.D. 325.

In Greek it reads

Πιστεύομεν εἰς ἕνα Θεὸν Πατέρα παντοκράτορα πάντων ὁρατῶν τε καὶ ἀοράτων ποιητήν· καὶ εἰς ἕνα Κύριον Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν τὸν Υἱὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ, γεννηθέντα ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς μονογενῆ τουτέστιν ἐκ τῆς οὐσίας τοῦ Πατρος Θεὸν ἐκ Θεοῦ, Φῶς ἐκ Φωτός,Θεὸν ἀληθινὸν ἐκ Θεοῦ ἀληθινοῦ,γεννηθέντα, οὐ ποιηθέντα,ὁμοούσιον τῷ Πατρί,δι’ οὗ τὰ πάντα ἐγένετο τά τε ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ καὶ τὰ ἐν τῇ γῇ,τὸν δι’ ἡμᾶς τοὺς ἀνθρώπους, καὶ διὰ τὴν ἡμετέραν σωτηρίαν,κατελθόντα,καὶ σαρκωθέντα,καὶ ἐνανθρωπήσαντα,παθόντα,καὶ ἀναστάντα τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρᾳ,ἀνελθόντα εἰς τοὺς οὐρανούς,ἐρχόμενον κρῖναι ζῶντας καὶ νεκρούς.καὶ εἰς τὸ Ἅγιον Πνεῦμα.Τοὺς δὲ λέγοντας Ἦν ποτε ὅτε οὐκ ἦν,καὶ Πρὶν γεννηθῆναι οὐκ ἦν,καὶ ὅτι Ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων εγένετο,ἢ Ἐξ ἑτέρας ὑποστάσεως ἢ οὐσιάς φάσκοντας εἶναι ἢ κτιστόν ἢ τρεπτόν ἢ ἀλλοιωτὸν τὸν Υἱὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ,τούτους ἀναθεματίζει ἡ ἁγία καθολικὴ καὶ ἀποστολικὴ ἐκκλησία.

In Latin it reads

Credimus in unum Deum patrem omnipotentem, omnium visibilium et invisibilium factorem. Et in unum Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum filium Dei,  natum ex Patre unigenitum,  hoc est, de substantia Patris,  Deum ex Deo,  lumen ex lumine,  Deum verum de Deo vero,  natum non factum,  unius substantiae cum Patre, quod graece dicunt homousion,  per quem omnia facta sunt quae in coelo et in terra,  qui propter nostram salutem descendit,  incarnatus est,  et homo factus est,  et passus est,  et resurrexit tertia die,  et adscendit in coelos,  venturus judicare vivos et mortuos.  Et in Spiritum sanctum.  Eos autem, qui dicunt, Erat quando non erat,  et ante quam nasceretur non erat,  et quod de non exstantibus factus est,  vel ex alia substantia aut essentia, dicentes convertibilem et demutabilem Deum:  hos anathematizat catholica Ecclesia.

In English it reads

We believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible; And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten from the Father, only-begotten, that is, from the substance of the Father,God from God,light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made,of one substance with the Father,through Whom all things came into being,things in heaven and things on earth,Who because of us men and because of our salvation came down,and became incarnate and became man,and suffered,and rose again on the third day, and ascended to the heavens, and will come to judge the living and dead,And in the Holy Spirit. But as for those who say, There was when He was not, and, Before being born He was not, and that He came into existence out of nothing,or who assert that the Son of God is of a different hypostasis or substance, or created, or is subject to alteration or change - these the Catholic and apostolic Church anathematizes.

Here is the updated form as defined in the first Ecumenical Council in Nicaea in A.D. 325.

In Greek it reads

Πιστεύομεν εἰς ἕνα Θεὸν Πατέρα παντοκράτορα ποιητὴν οὐρανοῦ καὶ γῆς ὁρατῶν τε πάντων καὶ ἀοράτων· καὶ εἰς ἕνα Κύριον Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ τὸν Μονογενῆ,τὸν ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς γεννηθέντα πρὸ πάντων τῶν αἰώνων,Φῶς ἐκ Φωτός,Θεὸν ἀληθινὸν ἐκ Θεοῦ ἀληθινοῦ,γεννηθέντα οὐ ποιηθέντα,ὁμοούσιον τῷ Πατρί,δι' οὗ τὰ πάντα ἐγένετο· τὸν δι' ἡμᾶς τοὺς ἀνθρώπους καὶ διὰ τὴν ἡμετέραν σωτηρίαν κατελθόντα ἐκ τῶν οὐρανῶν,καὶ σαρκωθέντα ἐκ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου καὶ Μαρίας τῆς παρθένου,καὶ ἐνανθρωπήσαντα,σταυρωθέντα τε ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν ἐπὶ Ποντίου Πιλάτου,καὶ παθόντα, καὶ ταφέντα,καὶ ἀναστάντα τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρᾳ κατὰ τὰς γραφὰς,καὶ ἀνελθόντα εἰς τοὺς οὐρανοὺς,καὶ καθεζόμενον ἐν δεξιᾷ τοῦ Πατρὸς,καὶ πάλιν ἐρχόμενον μετὰ δόξης κρῖναι ζῶντας καὶ νεκρούς,οὗ τῆς βασιλείας οὐκ ἔσται τέλος· καὶ εἰς τὸ Πνεῦμα τὸ Ἅγιον, τὸ Κύριον καὶ Ζωοποιόν,τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς ἐκπορευόμενον,τὸ σὺν Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ συμπροσκυνούμενον καὶ συνδοξαζόμενον,τὸ λαλῆσαν διὰ τῶν προφητῶν· εἰς μίαν ἁγίαν καθολικὴν καὶ ἀποστολικὴν ἐκκλησίαν· ὁμολογοῦμεν ἓν βάπτισμα εἰς ἄφεσιν ἁμαρτιῶν· προσδοκῶμεν ἀνάστασιν νεκρῶν,καὶ ζωὴν τοῦ μέλλοντος αἰῶνος. ἀμήν.

In Latin it reads

Credimus in unum Deum, Patrem omnipotentem, factorem coeli et terrae, visibilium omnium et invisibilium, et in unum Dominum Jesum Christum, Filium Dei unicum, de Patre natum ante omnia saecula; Deum verum de Deo vero; natum, non factum; ejusdemque substantiae qua Pater est; per quem omnia facta sunt; qui propter nos homines et propter nostram salutem descendit, incarnatus est de Spiritu sancto, in Maria virgine homo factus, crucifixus pro nobis sub Pontio Pilato, sepultus, resurrexit tertia die, ascendit ad coelos, sedet ad dexteram Patris; inde venturus est cum gloria judicare vivos ac mortuos, cujus regni non erit finis. Et in Spiritum sanctum, Dominum ac vivificatorem a Patre procedentem, qui cum Patre et Filio adoratur et glorificatur, qui locutus est per Prophetas; in unam catholicam atque apostolicam Ecclesiam. Confitemur unum baptismum in remissionem peccatorum; speramus resurrectionem mortuorum, vitam futuri saeculi. Amen.

In English it reads

We believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible; And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, begotten from the Father before all ages,  light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father, through Whom all things came into existence, Who because of us men and because of our salvation came down from the heavens, and was incarnate from the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary and became man, and was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried, and rose again on the third day according to the Scriptures and ascended to heaven, and sits on the right hand of the Father, and will come again with glory to judge living and dead, of Whose kingdom there will be no end; And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and life-giver, Who proceeds from the Father, Who with the Father and the Son is together worshipped and together glorified, Who spoke through the prophets; in one holy Catholic and apostolic Church. We confess one baptism to the remission of sins; we look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen

We can see in the Nicene Creed that the meaning of “Son of God” is not the same metaphorical meaning given in the Biblical passages above.  Granted, it does not portray God as procreating like the pagan gods.  However, I feel that saying that Jesus is “the only begotten Son of God, begotten from the Father before all ages,  light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father” does begin to approach the meaning of the Arabic word “walad” used in the Quran. 

The Trinity is, by definition, a mystery which we can’t understand.  But, we must use a word to describe the relationship.  To a strict monotheist, the Trinity is heretical.  If the Quran is going to condemn the Father –Son relationship in the Nicene Creed as heretical, then the Arabic word “walad” is the best word available to quickly explain what it is condemning.

The Quran on Jesus’ Death

The Quran on Jesus’ Death

One of the biggest barriers to agreement between Muslims and Christians is that both generally believe that one verse in the Quran denies the death of Jesus.  The death of Jesus is such a central theme to the New Testament that no Christian will accept the Quran if he/she believes that it denies the death of Jesus. 

However, I believe the Bible and Quran can be reconciled on this.  Now, this interpretation is significantly different from any of the dominant theories promoted by Islamic scholars.  But, the issue I am concerned with here is, can a Christian accept that the Quran speaks the truth about Jesus? 

This was one of the biggest problems I had when I first started studying the Quran.  Even when I accepted that God had led Muhammad, I still could not fully accept the Quran, as it is today, because I saw it as contradicting the Bible on Jesus’ death.  Jesus’ death is not something that is only briefly mentioned in the four accounts of Jesus’ life.  It is a major theme in all four.  And it is a theme in many of the other New Testament books.  As such, even the relatively few Christians who reject the Trinity will find it impossible to casually dismiss the death of Jesus.

This is a way that I found to reconcile the Bible and Quran regarding Jesus’ death.  It is different from what most Muslims believe, but it allowed me to accept the Quran as being given by God.  I think it is useful because it will allow Christians to take an honest look at the rest of the Quran.

And, to any Muslims reading this, it is certainly possible to interpret the Quran and Bible as contradicting each other on this matter.  It is your right to do so, if you choose.  But, to ask a Christian to believe that such a major theme as the death and resurrection of Jesus was added to the New Testament would be like a Muslim believing that Jesus is really God and the Quran was corrupted.  An open minded Christian will be willing to look at new interpretations of the text.  And, a Christian who is familiar with textual criticism may be willing to concede that small errors have crept into the text.  But, the death and resurrection of Jesus is such a major theme in so many books of the New Testament, that no Christian could casually assume that it is wrong.  Why not try to look for interpretations that don’t require you to assume major corruption in either the Bible or Quran?

Let’s start by looking at what the Quran means when it says someone didn’t kill someone else.

Quran 8:17

‏فَلَمْ تَقْتُلُوهُمْ وَلَكِنَّ ٱللَّهَ قَتَلَهُمْ ۚ وَمَا رَمَيْتَ إِذْ رَمَيْتَ وَلَكِنَّ ٱللَّهَ رَمَىٰ ۚ وَلِيُبْلِىَ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ مِنْهُ بَلَآءً حَسَنًا ۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌۭ

“Ye (Muslims) slew them not, but Allah slew them. And thou (Muhammad) threwest not when thou didst throw, but Allah threw, that He might test the believers by a fair test from Him. Lo! Allah is Hearer, Knower.” 

This was given in the aftermath of the battle of Badr, when the Muslims successfully fought off a much larger army from Mecca.  No Muslim in his right mind would take this verse to mean that the Muslims did not go to Badr, hit the Meccans with their swords, and the Meccans died.  This is clarified when it says that God killed them. 

What does the Quran say about Jesus?  I believe it also says God caused Jesus to die, meaning the Jews did not kill him.

Quran 3 (Al-Imran): 54, 55

وَمَكَرُوا۟ وَمَكَرَ ٱللَّهُ ۖ وَٱللَّهُ خَيْرُ ٱلْمَكِرِينَ

‏إِذْ قَالَ ٱللَّهُ يَعِيسَىٰٓ إِنِّى مُتَوَفِّيكَ وَرَافِعُكَ إِلَىَّ وَمُطَهِّرُكَ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ وَجَاعِلُ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱتَّبَعُوكَ فَوْقَ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوٓا۟ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ ٱلْقِيَمَةِ ۖ ثُمَّ إِلَىَّ مَرْجِعُكُمْ فَأَحْكُمُ بَيْنَكُمْ فِيمَا كُنتُمْ فِيهِ تَخْتَلِفُونَ

“And the unbelievers schemed [against Jesus]; but God brought their scheming to nought: for God is above all schemers. Lo! God said: "O Jesus! Verily, I shall cause thee to die, and shall exalt thee unto Me….”  (Muhammad Asad interpretation)

Most of the translations write, “I will take thee” instead of “I will cause thee to die”.  However, “I will cause thee to die” is the most literal translation.

Al-Mawrid: A Modern Arabic-English Dictionary, 7^th edition, defines مُتَوَفًّى (mutawaffan) as, “dead, deceased, defunct, departed, late”.

Reading it this way would seem to indicate that God determined Jesus’ death, just as He had with the Meccans at Badr.        

The Quran also quotes Jesus, when he was a child, as stating this about his future.

Quran 19 (Maryam):  33, 34

 ‏كِلْتَا ٱلْجَنَّتَيْنِ ءَاتَتْ أُكُلَهَا وَلَمْ تَظْلِم مِّنْهُ شَيْـًۭٔا ۚ وَفَجَّرْنَا خِلَلَهُمَا نَهَرًۭا

"So peace is on me the day I was born, the day that I die, and the day that I shall be raised up to life (again)"!

‏وَكَانَ لَهُۥ ثَمَرٌۭ فَقَالَ لِصَحِبِهِۦ وَهُوَ يُحَاوِرُهُۥٓ أَنَا۠ أَكْثَرُ مِنكَ مَالًۭا وَأَعَزُّ نَفَرًۭا

Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: (it is) a statement of truth, about which they (vainly) dispute.

Many people think the Bible says the Jews killed Jesus.  What does the Bible actually say?

 John 10:17-18

διὰ τοῦτό ὁ πατὴρ με ἀγαπᾷ, ὅτι ἐγὼ τίθημι τὴν ψυχήν μου, ἵνα πάλιν λάβω αὐτήν.

οὐδεὶς αἴρει αὐτὴν ἀπ᾿ ἐμοῦ, ἀλλ᾿ ἐγὼ τίθημι αὐτὴν ἀπ᾿ ἐμαυτοῦ· ἐξουσίαν ἔχω θεῖναι αὐτήν, καὶ ἐξουσίαν ἔχω πάλιν λαβεῖν αὐτήν· ταύτην τὴν ἐντολὴν ἔλαβον παρὰ τοῦ πατρός μου.

 "Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.  No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father." 

Here, Jesus makes an explicit statement that no man would kill him.  If no man would kill him, then the Jews didn’t kill him. 

Luke 23:46

καὶ φωνήσας φωνῇ μεγάλῃ ὁ ᾿Ιησοῦς εἶπε· πάτερ, εἰς χεῖράς σου παρατίθεμαι τὸ πνεῦμά μου· καὶ ταῦτα εἰπὼν ἐξέπνευσεν.

"And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost." 

This points out something that most people miss.  God took Jesus’s life before he succumbed to the effects of crucifixion, which normally took days.  Jesus did not die from crucifixion, even though it appeared that way.  If Jesus did not die from crucifixion, then the Jews didn’t really crucify him.

Acts 2:22-24, 32, 33

Ανδρες ᾿Ισραηλῖται, ἀκούσατε τοὺς λόγους τούτους· ᾿Ιησοῦν τὸν Ναζωραῖον, ἄνδρα ἀπὸ τοῦ Θεοῦ ἀποδεδειγμένον εἰς ὑμᾶς δυνάμεσι καὶ τέρασι καὶ σημείοις οἷς ἐποίησε δι᾿ αὐτοῦ ὁ Θεὸς ἐν μέσῳ ὑμῶν, καθὼς καὶ αὐτοὶ οἴδατε,

22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:

τοῦτον τῇ ὡρισμένῃ βουλῇ καὶ προγνώσει τοῦ Θεοῦ ἔκδοτον λαβόντες, διὰ χειρὸς ἀνόμων προσπήξαντες ἀνείλατε·

23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:

ὃν ὁ Θεὸς ἀνέστησε λύσας τὰς ὠδῖνας τοῦ θανάτου, καθότι οὐκ ἦν δυνατὸν κρατεῖσθαι αὐτὸν ὑπ᾿ αὐτοῦ.

24 Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.

…….

τοῦτον τὸν ᾿Ιησοῦν ἀνέστησεν ὁ Θεός, οὗ πάντες ἡμεῖς ἐσμεν μάρτυρες.

32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.

τῇ δεξιᾷ οὖν τοῦ Θεοῦ ὑψωθεὶς, τήν τε ἐπαγγελίαν τοῦ ῾Αγίου Πνεύματος λαβὼν παρὰ τοῦ πατρὸς, ἐξέχεε τοῦτο ὃ νῦν ὑμεῖς βλέπετε καὶ ἀκούετε.

33 Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear.

Here, Peter says that the Jewish leaders were only able to carry out what God determined and knew ahead of time.  It seemed to the Jews that they had crucified and killed Jesus, but it was God who determined what would happen.  They did not successfully kill Jesus because God raised him up to heaven.

Now, let’s look at the famous statement in context.

Quran 4:154-159

‏وَرَفَعْنَا فَوْقَهُمُ ٱلطُّورَ بِمِيثَقِهِمْ وَقُلْنَا لَهُمُ ٱدْخُلُوا۟ ٱلْبَابَ سُجَّدًۭا وَقُلْنَا لَهُمْ لَا تَعْدُوا۟ فِى ٱلسَّبْتِ وَأَخَذْنَا مِنْهُم مِّيثَقًا غَلِيظًۭا

154 And for their covenant we raised over them (the towering height) of Mount (Sinai); and we said: "Enter the gate with humility"; and we commanded them: "Transgress not in the matter of the sabbath." And we took from them a solemn covenant.   

‏فَبِمَا نَقْضِهِم مِّيثَقَهُمْ وَكُفْرِهِم بِـَٔايَتِ ٱللَّهِ وَقَتْلِهِمُ ٱلْأَنۢبِيَآءَ بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّۢ وَقَوْلِهِمْ قُلُوبُنَا غُلْفٌۢ ۚ بَلْ طَبَعَ ٱللَّهُ عَلَيْهَا بِكُفْرِهِمْ فَلَا يُؤْمِنُونَ إِلَّا قَلِيلًۭا

155 (They have incurred divine displeasure): In that they broke their covenant; that they rejected the signs of Allah; that they slew the Messengers in defiance of right; that they said, "Our hearts are the wrappings (which preserve Allah's Word; We need no more)";- Nay, Allah hath set the seal on their hearts for their blasphemy, and little is it they believe;-   

 ‏وَبِكُفْرِهِمْ وَقَوْلِهِمْ عَلَىٰ مَرْيَمَ بُهْتَنًا عَظِيمًۭا

156 That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge;  

‏وَقَوْلِهِمْ إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا ٱلْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ٱبْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ ٱللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَكِن شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ ۚ وَإِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱخْتَلَفُوا۟ فِيهِ لَفِى شَكٍّۢ مِّنْهُ ۚ مَا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِلَّا ٱتِّبَاعَ ٱلظَّنِّ ۚ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينًۢا

157 That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-    

 ‏بَل رَّفَعَهُ ٱللَّهُ إِلَيْهِ ۚ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ عَزِيزًا حَكِيمًۭا

158 Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise;-   

 ‏وَإِن مِّنْ أَهْلِ ٱلْكِتَبِ إِلَّا لَيُؤْمِنَنَّ بِهِۦ قَبْلَ مَوْتِهِۦ ۖ وَيَوْمَ ٱلْقِيَمَةِ يَكُونُ عَلَيْهِمْ شَهِيدًۭا

159 And there is none of the People of the Book but must believe in him before his death; and on the Day of Judgment he will be a witness against them;-

Verse 157 is usually used to criticize Christians for believing in Jesus’ death.  But the context is a criticism of the Jews for boasting that they had killed and crucified Jesus, whereby the Jews today imply that he wasn’t the true Messiah.  The context is not a criticism of the Christians and their beliefs at all, even though it is used this way.  Instead, it a criticism of a group of Jews for boasting that they had killed Jesus, just like how the Muslims would naturally have wanted to boast about their great victory at Badr.